Saturday, 13 September 2014
Reading the Morlands: "The Dark Rose", completed
But back to the book I've just finished reading.
Nanette = awesome. Especially for inserting an entirely fictitious character relatively well into real events. Kudos to Harrod-Eagles for not overplaying her hand, and for keeping Nanette's close involvement with the court to only two Queens. Nanette's taste in men = far better at the end of the book than in the middle. I still say that the majority of Morland heirs are utter gits. Young Paul seems to be a little better, though. (No idea if he'll still be alive when I open the next book.)
Religious conservatism of the Morlands: not as well explained/justified as I would have liked. I could have done with the conversation between Nanette and James Chapham on such things going on for another page to actually talk about it instead of just stating the position. H-E's (it's too long to type, I'm lazy today) position seems to be "they're Northern, therefore". Don't know whether this doesn't satisfy me because I'm Protestant, or because I'm not English, or what. But I'd certainly like further explanation - I may get it later on, of course.
H-E does have her favourites, doesn't she? But then so do I, it's just that they're not hers. And on the continuum of Jean Plaidy through to the HBO? Showtime? series The Tudors, H-E isn't all that bad. She doesn't delete an entire line of the family, leaving the kingdom without an eventual heir, for example (I just recently watched all the way through The Tudors. I'm not sure I can manage a blogged rewatch - not for a few years, anyway, but I do want to post something about it here at some point.)
So yes - not giving up on it just yet. :-)